We are happy to report that on April 3, 2019, we helped obtain a sizable verdict for our client following a trial on damages for excessive force. The trial was in federal court in the Eastern District of New York and lasted three days. The jury returned a verdict of $90,000 for a broken nose, and $355,000 in punitive damages against three police officers.
Author: Michael Lumer
LLG Has Moved
We are pleased to announce that, effective March 1, 2019, Lumer Law has relocated to 305 Broadway. Our telephone numbers and email addresses remain the same. We look forward to seeing you there.
Police Assault on Video
On June 1, 2018, our client was awarded $3,000,000 in compensatory and punitive damages with respect to the NYPD’s use of excessive force against him on April 23, 2014. See here and here. Unfortunately, this was not the last time Thomas Jennings would be assaulted without justification by police officers.
On July 7, 2015, Thomas Jennings walked into a bodega. He walked in and and began a conversation with an employee behind the counter. Moments later, NYPD PO Lenny Lutchman walks in, his retractable baton in hand. He ordered our client to the ground. Mr. Jennings, his arms outstretched and palms empty, asked repeatedly what it was that he had done. Seconds later, PO Pearce Martinez rushed in and immediately begins punching Mr. Jennings in the head. Lutchman jumps in, driving the butt end of his baton into Jennings’ body several times. A bloodied and beaten Thomas Jennings is then escorted from the store.
Luckily for Mr. Jennings, and much to the officers’ later surprise, this act of police brutality was captured on video.
The officers, unaware of the video, went back to the station house and completed arrest paperwork in which they stated that no force was used in making the arrest. Thomas Jennings’ injuries, Martinez wrote in his memo book, must have come about accidentally.
As for the arrest itself, it was based on a claim that Mr. Jennings and another man had robbed a local takeout restaurant at knifepoint earlier that afternoon. However, there was video of that supposed “crime” as well. That video, which was, in fact, several videos taken from different cameras, made clear that there was no robbery, no knife, no violence, no threats of violence, and no crime committed by Thomas Jennings. All of the criminal charges against him were dismissed shortly thereafter.
Mr. Jennings’ civil lawsuit against the officers is continuing.
$3 Million Excessive Force Verdict
On April 23, 2014, Thomas Jennings was brutalized and subjected to excessive force by several members of the NYPD. He subsequently sued. On June 1, 2018, following a three-day trial and five hours of deliberation, a jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York returned a verdict for Mr. Jennings for $3,000,000, finding that that three NYPD officers had deliberately used excessive force against him. Michael Lumer was c0-counsel for Mr. Jennings at trial, along with his long-time attorney Amy Rameau, Esq. The jury found that PO Andrew Yurkiw had, without justification, struck plaintiff in the face several times, and that his colleagues, POs Amber Lagrandier and Joseph Solomito had also beaten and struck plaintiff after Yurkiw’s blows had knocked Mr. Jennings to the ground. Plaintiff suffered a bi-lateral nasal fracture with a displaced septum, and other injuries to his face, head, and body. The verdict was reported recently in the Daily News.
In reaching this verdict, the jury expressly rejected the officers’ testimony that plaintiff had swung at Yurkiw, attempted to flee, or resist arrest. Rather, the jury found that the officers lied repeatedly and collectively about how and why they used force against Thomas Jennings, and went so far as to deny that he was actually hurt, even though his medical records fully documented his injuries. In response, the jury awarded Mr. Jennings $500,000 in compensatory damages, and assessed punitive damages against Yurkiw, Lagrandier, and Solomito, for $1,000,000, $750,000, and $750,000, respectively.
We are grateful that the jury recognized the officers’ initial misconduct, and that these officers had lied and covered up their actions by falsifying claims against Mr. Jennings. Perhaps more importantly, the jury made that the officers’ refusal to admit to their misconduct and their years of lying and fabricating were unacceptable. It is hopefully a message that will be heard at One Police Plaza.
LLG Fee Award Adopted
We are pleased to announce that, on April 30, 2018, a district court in the Eastern District of New York adopted a report and recommendation that the Lumer Law Group receive more than $209,000 in legal fees and costs in the midst of an ongoing case (Thomas v. City of New York, 14 CV 7513(ENV) (VMS)). The figure includes an hourly rate of $450 for Michael Lumer, which is at the uppermost end of rates awarded in this district.
The underlying action concerns the NYPD’s arrest of 25 people in May 2014 in two apartments in a multi-family home in Brooklyn. Within a week of the arrest, the Brooklyn District Attorney’s office had either declined to prosecute or dismissed all charges against everyone arrested at the premises. Michael Lumer filed suit in late 2014 on behalf of 15 of these people, and three more who were arrested outside in a common driveway that runs behind the house. Six of these people were charged with gambling. However, as the defendants eventually had to admit, they had no idea whether any of these six people (or anyone at all) were gambling. Moreover, the defendants also had to concede that the conduct in question — playing poker inside someone’s apartment — was not illegal. Having forced the plaintiff’s to fight this matter all the way into February 2017, the defendants offered to not only pay fixed amounts to each of these six plaintiffs, they also offered to pay Mr. Lumer and his firm their legal fees for the work performed to date.
On December 1, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation that called for the firm to receive payment for 100% of the work performed. Mr. Lumer’s hourly rate was fixed at $450, which is consistent with the highest rates allowable in the EDNY. The defendants did not object in any way to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. Not suprisingly, on April 30, the district court adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety.
Meanwhile, the lawsuit on behalf of the remaining 12 plaintiffs continues.